<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 698 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151039</link>
    <description>Rebate of duty on exported goods cannot be denied to a bona fide merchant exporter merely because the manufacturer-supplier allegedly availed and utilised Cenvat credit on bogus invoices. Where export of duty-paid goods is supported by ARE-1 forms, customs certification and other records, and there is no evidence of collusion, mutuality of interest, financial control, flow-back of funds or lack of bona fides, the exporter cannot be made to suffer for the supplier&#039;s independent default. The proper remedy lies against the supplier under the credit recovery and penal provisions. On these facts, the rebate claim is admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 17:52:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 698 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151039</link>
      <description>Rebate of duty on exported goods cannot be denied to a bona fide merchant exporter merely because the manufacturer-supplier allegedly availed and utilised Cenvat credit on bogus invoices. Where export of duty-paid goods is supported by ARE-1 forms, customs certification and other records, and there is no evidence of collusion, mutuality of interest, financial control, flow-back of funds or lack of bona fides, the exporter cannot be made to suffer for the supplier&#039;s independent default. The proper remedy lies against the supplier under the credit recovery and penal provisions. On these facts, the rebate claim is admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>