<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (9) TMI 163 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151003</link>
    <description>Undefined taxing entries must be construed according to common parlance and trade understanding. Thermometers, lactometers, syringes, eye-wash glasses and measuring glasses were not regarded as glassware under the relevant taxable-goods entry because their commercial identity and use did not ordinarily fall within that description, even where glass formed part of the articles. Plastic rubbers and plastic pieces were treated as taxable plastic articles at the applicable rate. Small turnover or hardship from reassessment cannot justify annulment where tax liability is otherwise established. The glassware contention succeeded, while the hardship-based challenge to assessments of plastic goods failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 12:34:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (9) TMI 163 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151003</link>
      <description>Undefined taxing entries must be construed according to common parlance and trade understanding. Thermometers, lactometers, syringes, eye-wash glasses and measuring glasses were not regarded as glassware under the relevant taxable-goods entry because their commercial identity and use did not ordinarily fall within that description, even where glass formed part of the articles. Plastic rubbers and plastic pieces were treated as taxable plastic articles at the applicable rate. Small turnover or hardship from reassessment cannot justify annulment where tax liability is otherwise established. The glassware contention succeeded, while the hardship-based challenge to assessments of plastic goods failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>