<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (11) TMI 134 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150989</link>
    <description>Resale deduction under section 8(ii) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 is available only where the goods were purchased from a registered dealer dealing in that very class of goods in the course of his business. A registered dealer&#039;s casual sale outside the scope of his business does not satisfy the statutory requirement and is treated like a sale by an unregistered dealer. On that construction, the deduction was not admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 11:40:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (11) TMI 134 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150989</link>
      <description>Resale deduction under section 8(ii) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 is available only where the goods were purchased from a registered dealer dealing in that very class of goods in the course of his business. A registered dealer&#039;s casual sale outside the scope of his business does not satisfy the statutory requirement and is treated like a sale by an unregistered dealer. On that construction, the deduction was not admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>