<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (12) TMI 87 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150949</link>
    <description>A chemist preparing medicine mixtures on doctors&#039; prescriptions and selling them was not a &quot;manufacturer&quot; for tax purposes because manufacture requires emergence of a commercially different article. The court held that the medicine mixtures did not meet that test, so turnover from their sale was outside section 3-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act. It further held that a later amendment to entry 39 in the notification could not alter the settled judicial meaning of &quot;manufacturer&quot; in the statute; a delegated notification can exempt additional persons, but cannot expand statutory liability beyond the concept of manufacture.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 10:33:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (12) TMI 87 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150949</link>
      <description>A chemist preparing medicine mixtures on doctors&#039; prescriptions and selling them was not a &quot;manufacturer&quot; for tax purposes because manufacture requires emergence of a commercially different article. The court held that the medicine mixtures did not meet that test, so turnover from their sale was outside section 3-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act. It further held that a later amendment to entry 39 in the notification could not alter the settled judicial meaning of &quot;manufacturer&quot; in the statute; a delegated notification can exempt additional persons, but cannot expand statutory liability beyond the concept of manufacture.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>