<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (4) TMI 113 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150945</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 12(3) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 is sustainable where disputed turnover is not disclosed in monthly returns or in books produced before the assessing authority and is discovered only through investigation. Disclosure made only after a pre-assessment notice does not amount to true disclosure when the turnover was absent from the returns and branch accounts, and the claim that it appeared in head office accounts was not established. On those facts, the turnover would not have come to light without the assessing authority&#039;s inquiry, bringing the case within section 12(3) and justifying penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 10:16:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (4) TMI 113 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150945</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 12(3) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 is sustainable where disputed turnover is not disclosed in monthly returns or in books produced before the assessing authority and is discovered only through investigation. Disclosure made only after a pre-assessment notice does not amount to true disclosure when the turnover was absent from the returns and branch accounts, and the claim that it appeared in head office accounts was not established. On those facts, the turnover would not have come to light without the assessing authority&#039;s inquiry, bringing the case within section 12(3) and justifying penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>