<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (8) TMI 95 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150925</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka ruled in favor of the petitioner, a director of a company, in a case challenging recovery proceedings for sales tax dues initiated against him personally. The court held that there was no provision allowing recovery from a company&#039;s director and quashed the proceedings. The respondents were directed to cease proceedings against the petitioner, who was also awarded costs and advocate&#039;s fee. The petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 17:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (8) TMI 95 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150925</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka ruled in favor of the petitioner, a director of a company, in a case challenging recovery proceedings for sales tax dues initiated against him personally. The court held that there was no provision allowing recovery from a company&#039;s director and quashed the proceedings. The respondents were directed to cease proceedings against the petitioner, who was also awarded costs and advocate&#039;s fee. The petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>