<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (2) TMI 69 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150872</link>
    <description>For exemption on the ground of second sales, the assessee had only to show an anterior taxable sale and that tax was payable by the earlier seller; proof of actual tax payment by the seller was not required. The Tribunal&#039;s requirement that the assessee prove actual payment of tax was incorrect and was modified accordingly. Despite that clarification, the revision failed and the petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:44:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (2) TMI 69 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150872</link>
      <description>For exemption on the ground of second sales, the assessee had only to show an anterior taxable sale and that tax was payable by the earlier seller; proof of actual tax payment by the seller was not required. The Tribunal&#039;s requirement that the assessee prove actual payment of tax was incorrect and was modified accordingly. Despite that clarification, the revision failed and the petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>