<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (1) TMI 79 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150871</link>
    <description>Mere packing of separately purchased glass bottles, rubber nipples and plastic caps in a carton and selling them as an &quot;auto feeder&quot; did not amount to manufacture under section 2(17) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Manufacture requires a process such as producing, making, altering, finishing or otherwise processing or adapting the goods so that a commercially different commodity emerges. Here, the items were neither modified nor altered; they were only selected, packed together and relabelled, and each retained its separate identity. The activity therefore fell short of manufacture, and the finding was in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:42:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (1) TMI 79 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150871</link>
      <description>Mere packing of separately purchased glass bottles, rubber nipples and plastic caps in a carton and selling them as an &quot;auto feeder&quot; did not amount to manufacture under section 2(17) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Manufacture requires a process such as producing, making, altering, finishing or otherwise processing or adapting the goods so that a commercially different commodity emerges. Here, the items were neither modified nor altered; they were only selected, packed together and relabelled, and each retained its separate identity. The activity therefore fell short of manufacture, and the finding was in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>