<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (1) TMI 78 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150870</link>
    <description>Polishing or colouring old or second-hand furniture before sale did not amount to manufacture under the Bombay Sales Tax Act because, despite the wide statutory definition of manufacture, the decisive test was whether a new or different commercial commodity emerged. Old furniture that was merely polished or coloured remained the same furniture and did not become a distinct commercial product. The activity therefore was not manufacture, and the person carrying it on was not a manufacturer for purposes of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:40:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (1) TMI 78 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150870</link>
      <description>Polishing or colouring old or second-hand furniture before sale did not amount to manufacture under the Bombay Sales Tax Act because, despite the wide statutory definition of manufacture, the decisive test was whether a new or different commercial commodity emerged. Old furniture that was merely polished or coloured remained the same furniture and did not become a distinct commercial product. The activity therefore was not manufacture, and the person carrying it on was not a manufacturer for purposes of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>