<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (1) TMI 75 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150860</link>
    <description>Preparation and supply of a design to a customer was held not to constitute a sale within the meaning of section 2(28) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The court applied its earlier decision on an identical issue concerning preparation and supply of artwork and treated that precedent as controlling. On that basis, the transaction was not regarded as a taxable sale, and the Tribunal&#039;s view that the impugned transaction was not a sale was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:39:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (1) TMI 75 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150860</link>
      <description>Preparation and supply of a design to a customer was held not to constitute a sale within the meaning of section 2(28) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The court applied its earlier decision on an identical issue concerning preparation and supply of artwork and treated that precedent as controlling. On that basis, the transaction was not regarded as a taxable sale, and the Tribunal&#039;s view that the impugned transaction was not a sale was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>