<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (8) TMI 91 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150855</link>
    <description>Penalty proceedings under section 12-A(1-A) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act require strict compliance with statutory preconditions: the notice must reflect the assessing authority&#039;s satisfaction that escapement of turnover resulted from wilful non-disclosure and must give a reasonable opportunity to show cause. A notice issued as one under section 12(4), framed on the basis of post-assessment penalty, did not meet those requirements and could not be recast to support penalty under section 12-A(1-A). Because that penalty must be imposed simultaneously with assessment, the penalty order based on the defective notice was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:32:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (8) TMI 91 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150855</link>
      <description>Penalty proceedings under section 12-A(1-A) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act require strict compliance with statutory preconditions: the notice must reflect the assessing authority&#039;s satisfaction that escapement of turnover resulted from wilful non-disclosure and must give a reasonable opportunity to show cause. A notice issued as one under section 12(4), framed on the basis of post-assessment penalty, did not meet those requirements and could not be recast to support penalty under section 12-A(1-A). Because that penalty must be imposed simultaneously with assessment, the penalty order based on the defective notice was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>