<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (12) TMI 58 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150821</link>
    <description>A reference to the High Court under section 23(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1946 lay only from Tribunal orders passed under section 21(2) or section 22(1). A rectification order under section 23A was a distinct order and, on the plain wording of the statute, could not be brought within the enumerated categories by implication. The analogous scheme of the Income-tax Act, 1922 supported the same restrictive reading of reference jurisdiction. Accordingly, no reference could be entertained where it arose solely from a rectification order under section 23A, and the preliminary objection to maintainability was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:37:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (12) TMI 58 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150821</link>
      <description>A reference to the High Court under section 23(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1946 lay only from Tribunal orders passed under section 21(2) or section 22(1). A rectification order under section 23A was a distinct order and, on the plain wording of the statute, could not be brought within the enumerated categories by implication. The analogous scheme of the Income-tax Act, 1922 supported the same restrictive reading of reference jurisdiction. Accordingly, no reference could be entertained where it arose solely from a rectification order under section 23A, and the preliminary objection to maintainability was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>