<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (2) TMI 96 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150812</link>
    <description>Glass sheets were not treated as &quot;glassware&quot; for sales tax classification purposes and instead fell within the residuary entry. The governing test was the commercial or trade parlance meaning of the commodity, not the dictionary meaning, unless trade evidence was unavailable. On the evidence before the taxing authority, traders and manufacturers regarded &quot;glass&quot; and &quot;glassware&quot; as distinct categories, and sheet glass was not included within &quot;glassware&quot;. That factual finding accorded with established principles of commercial interpretation of entries in sales tax schedules, so the commodity was classified under the residuary schedule entry rather than the specific glassware entry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:46:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (2) TMI 96 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150812</link>
      <description>Glass sheets were not treated as &quot;glassware&quot; for sales tax classification purposes and instead fell within the residuary entry. The governing test was the commercial or trade parlance meaning of the commodity, not the dictionary meaning, unless trade evidence was unavailable. On the evidence before the taxing authority, traders and manufacturers regarded &quot;glass&quot; and &quot;glassware&quot; as distinct categories, and sheet glass was not included within &quot;glassware&quot;. That factual finding accorded with established principles of commercial interpretation of entries in sales tax schedules, so the commodity was classified under the residuary schedule entry rather than the specific glassware entry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>