<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (3) TMI 114 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150809</link>
    <description>For the concessional scheme under section 7 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, the expression &quot;total turnover&quot; was held to include second sales of declared goods. The Court reasoned that the Act used a wide definition covering aggregate turnover in all goods, and that declared goods do not receive a restricted meaning for this purpose; the Central Sales Tax Act only preserves the single-point levy and rate limits. Including such second sales in the turnover computation did not amount to taxing them again, and sections 14 and 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act and article 286(3) of the Constitution did not bar that inclusion. The concessional rate was therefore unavailable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:30:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (3) TMI 114 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150809</link>
      <description>For the concessional scheme under section 7 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, the expression &quot;total turnover&quot; was held to include second sales of declared goods. The Court reasoned that the Act used a wide definition covering aggregate turnover in all goods, and that declared goods do not receive a restricted meaning for this purpose; the Central Sales Tax Act only preserves the single-point levy and rate limits. Including such second sales in the turnover computation did not amount to taxing them again, and sections 14 and 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act and article 286(3) of the Constitution did not bar that inclusion. The concessional rate was therefore unavailable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>