<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (7) TMI 101 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150804</link>
    <description>Section 8(2A) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 applies only where goods are exempt from tax generally, not where relief is limited to a single stage or conditional exemption. The commentary explains that tanned hides and skins, though already taxed in raw form under the State sales tax scheme, remained within the tax net and were only protected from further levy after earlier collection. The State refund mechanism and the interaction with sections 14 and 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act supported that view. Accordingly, such goods did not qualify for the nil rate under section 8(2A), and the proper relief was reimbursement of tax already paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:38:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (7) TMI 101 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150804</link>
      <description>Section 8(2A) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 applies only where goods are exempt from tax generally, not where relief is limited to a single stage or conditional exemption. The commentary explains that tanned hides and skins, though already taxed in raw form under the State sales tax scheme, remained within the tax net and were only protected from further levy after earlier collection. The State refund mechanism and the interaction with sections 14 and 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act supported that view. Accordingly, such goods did not qualify for the nil rate under section 8(2A), and the proper relief was reimbursement of tax already paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>