<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (7) TMI 127 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150786</link>
    <description>Ultramarine blue, commonly known as neel, was held not to fall within the expression &quot;dyes&quot; in entry 25 of Schedule II, Part II, of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958. The classification turned on its ordinary commercial use and common understanding: it functioned mainly as a washing blue or pigment, not as a substance that permanently impregnates fabric, fixes to it, or withstands light, water, detergents, or alkalies. The entry was construed in the context of associated goods of the same general class, and not in an extended sense. The commodity was therefore taxable only under the residuary entry in Part VI of Schedule II.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:50:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (7) TMI 127 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150786</link>
      <description>Ultramarine blue, commonly known as neel, was held not to fall within the expression &quot;dyes&quot; in entry 25 of Schedule II, Part II, of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958. The classification turned on its ordinary commercial use and common understanding: it functioned mainly as a washing blue or pigment, not as a substance that permanently impregnates fabric, fixes to it, or withstands light, water, detergents, or alkalies. The entry was construed in the context of associated goods of the same general class, and not in an extended sense. The commodity was therefore taxable only under the residuary entry in Part VI of Schedule II.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>