<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (1) TMI 68 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150775</link>
    <description>The Sales Tax Tribunal under the Orissa Sales Tax Act was not a court in the strict sense, so section 5 of the Limitation Act did not apply of its own force. Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act nevertheless extended sections 4 to 24 to proceedings under the special taxing statute where a different limitation period was prescribed and no inconsistency existed. The Tribunal was therefore competent to entertain an application for condonation of delay in a reference application under section 24(1), and the jurisdictional objection failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:48:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (1) TMI 68 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150775</link>
      <description>The Sales Tax Tribunal under the Orissa Sales Tax Act was not a court in the strict sense, so section 5 of the Limitation Act did not apply of its own force. Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act nevertheless extended sections 4 to 24 to proceedings under the special taxing statute where a different limitation period was prescribed and no inconsistency existed. The Tribunal was therefore competent to entertain an application for condonation of delay in a reference application under section 24(1), and the jurisdictional objection failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>