<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (10) TMI 85 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150755</link>
    <description>A statutory authority that disposes of goods only as an incident of a governmental distribution scheme or statutory control function does not carry on the business of selling goods for sales tax purposes. The Calcutta High Court held that the Iron and Steel Controller&#039;s sales of imported iron and steel, surplus war materials, and printed forms were part of an organised public programme and not an independent commercial occupation or avocation. The amended definition of &quot;business&quot; was considered, but the essential character of the activity remained non-commercial. The Controller therefore was not a dealer within section 2(c) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:42:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (10) TMI 85 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150755</link>
      <description>A statutory authority that disposes of goods only as an incident of a governmental distribution scheme or statutory control function does not carry on the business of selling goods for sales tax purposes. The Calcutta High Court held that the Iron and Steel Controller&#039;s sales of imported iron and steel, surplus war materials, and printed forms were part of an organised public programme and not an independent commercial occupation or avocation. The amended definition of &quot;business&quot; was considered, but the essential character of the activity remained non-commercial. The Controller therefore was not a dealer within section 2(c) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>