<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (2) TMI 64 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150746</link>
    <description>Where a registration certificate is liable to mandatory cancellation once the authority finds that the dealer&#039;s business has been discontinued, the decisive issue is the factual existence of continued business activity. The dealer had already been asked to produce records and prove that the business was still operating, and the materials showed repeated non-production of records and circumstances supporting discontinuance. On that basis, the authority could cancel the registration under section 7(6)(a) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. Natural justice did not require a second show-cause notice repeating the inevitable consequence of an adverse finding, because the earlier opportunity to meet the factual issue was sufficient.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:08:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (2) TMI 64 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150746</link>
      <description>Where a registration certificate is liable to mandatory cancellation once the authority finds that the dealer&#039;s business has been discontinued, the decisive issue is the factual existence of continued business activity. The dealer had already been asked to produce records and prove that the business was still operating, and the materials showed repeated non-production of records and circumstances supporting discontinuance. On that basis, the authority could cancel the registration under section 7(6)(a) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. Natural justice did not require a second show-cause notice repeating the inevitable consequence of an adverse finding, because the earlier opportunity to meet the factual issue was sufficient.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>