<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (3) TMI 94 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150739</link>
    <description>Tax assessed on a firm could not be recovered from an individual as a partner unless there was a finding establishing that he was in fact a partner. The assessment had been remanded for inquiry into the petitioner&#039;s status, but the assessing authority completed it without recording any such finding. As liability to recover firm tax from a person depends on proof of partnership, the department could not proceed against him on that footing. The recovery certificate was therefore unsustainable and was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:34:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (3) TMI 94 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150739</link>
      <description>Tax assessed on a firm could not be recovered from an individual as a partner unless there was a finding establishing that he was in fact a partner. The assessment had been remanded for inquiry into the petitioner&#039;s status, but the assessing authority completed it without recording any such finding. As liability to recover firm tax from a person depends on proof of partnership, the department could not proceed against him on that footing. The recovery certificate was therefore unsustainable and was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>