<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 924 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150730</link>
    <description>The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to compute the tax payable under section 234A based on the amount of tax retained by the assessee during the period when the income tax return was not filed. The Tribunal found no issue with the charging of interest under section 234B, deeming it mandatory and consequential.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 09:45:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 924 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150730</link>
      <description>The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to compute the tax payable under section 234A based on the amount of tax retained by the assessee during the period when the income tax return was not filed. The Tribunal found no issue with the charging of interest under section 234B, deeming it mandatory and consequential.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>