<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (11) TMI 75 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150728</link>
    <description>For limitation under section 21(2) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, the exclusion for time during which proceedings are stayed applied only when the stay was granted by a civil or other competent court. The Judge (Revisions), Sales Tax, though acting judicially and exercising powers resembling those of a court, was an authority constituted under the Act to supervise assessment proceedings and not a court in the statutory sense. The Act itself distinguished between a court and an authority, so the stay ordered by the revisional authority did not qualify for exclusion under the explanation to section 21(2). The assessment made after 3 February 1962 was therefore barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:34:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (11) TMI 75 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150728</link>
      <description>For limitation under section 21(2) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, the exclusion for time during which proceedings are stayed applied only when the stay was granted by a civil or other competent court. The Judge (Revisions), Sales Tax, though acting judicially and exercising powers resembling those of a court, was an authority constituted under the Act to supervise assessment proceedings and not a court in the statutory sense. The Act itself distinguished between a court and an authority, so the stay ordered by the revisional authority did not qualify for exclusion under the explanation to section 21(2). The assessment made after 3 February 1962 was therefore barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>