<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (4) TMI 89 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150712</link>
    <description>U.P. Sugarcane Purchase Tax Act, 1961 imposes purchase tax on sugarcane within the State&#039;s taxing power over sales and purchases of goods. It excludes transactions covered by the Act from sales or purchase tax under other U.P. enactments, maintaining a separate statutory levy. Its application to sugar factories and units in reserved areas is linked to the concentration of cane purchases, administrative convenience and collection costs. A uniform rate without quality-based classification requires proof of actual discriminatory disadvantage. Interest for delayed payment operates automatically as a statutory consequence and is distinct from a separate penalty for continuing default. Assessment notice and service disputes remain fact-dependent where recovery is challenged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:11:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (4) TMI 89 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150712</link>
      <description>U.P. Sugarcane Purchase Tax Act, 1961 imposes purchase tax on sugarcane within the State&#039;s taxing power over sales and purchases of goods. It excludes transactions covered by the Act from sales or purchase tax under other U.P. enactments, maintaining a separate statutory levy. Its application to sugar factories and units in reserved areas is linked to the concentration of cane purchases, administrative convenience and collection costs. A uniform rate without quality-based classification requires proof of actual discriminatory disadvantage. Interest for delayed payment operates automatically as a statutory consequence and is distinct from a separate penalty for continuing default. Assessment notice and service disputes remain fact-dependent where recovery is challenged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>