<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (7) TMI 98 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150710</link>
    <description>Ice was held not to fall within an exemption for &quot;water&quot; because it is a distinct substance after change of state, and a contrary administrative letter had no statutory force. Section 4(1) of the Jammu and Kashmir General Sales Tax Act, 1962 was upheld as a valid delegation because the Act disclosed its policy and imposed rate ceilings that supplied adequate legislative guidance. Item 34 and the second proviso of Notification No. S.R.O. 729 were found discriminatory under Article 14 because halwais were taxed differently from bakerywallas despite engaging in substantially similar activities, and the offending parts were severed and struck down.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:49:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (7) TMI 98 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150710</link>
      <description>Ice was held not to fall within an exemption for &quot;water&quot; because it is a distinct substance after change of state, and a contrary administrative letter had no statutory force. Section 4(1) of the Jammu and Kashmir General Sales Tax Act, 1962 was upheld as a valid delegation because the Act disclosed its policy and imposed rate ceilings that supplied adequate legislative guidance. Item 34 and the second proviso of Notification No. S.R.O. 729 were found discriminatory under Article 14 because halwais were taxed differently from bakerywallas despite engaging in substantially similar activities, and the offending parts were severed and struck down.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>