<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (6) TMI 50 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150707</link>
    <description>A co-operative society that pooled members&#039; groundnuts, financed growers, controlled auction sales, and earned commission was treated as carrying on a commercial venture rather than a mere incidental activity. The wide definition of &quot;dealer&quot; under the Bombay Sales Tax Act covered a person selling goods for commission or remuneration, and &quot;business&quot; was assessed by the integrated course of dealings, continuity, regularity, volume, and profit-motive. Actual profit in a particular year was not decisive; the society&#039;s overall selling arrangement showed a profit-motive, so the auction sales of members&#039; groundnuts were liable to sales tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:27:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (6) TMI 50 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150707</link>
      <description>A co-operative society that pooled members&#039; groundnuts, financed growers, controlled auction sales, and earned commission was treated as carrying on a commercial venture rather than a mere incidental activity. The wide definition of &quot;dealer&quot; under the Bombay Sales Tax Act covered a person selling goods for commission or remuneration, and &quot;business&quot; was assessed by the integrated course of dealings, continuity, regularity, volume, and profit-motive. Actual profit in a particular year was not decisive; the society&#039;s overall selling arrangement showed a profit-motive, so the auction sales of members&#039; groundnuts were liable to sales tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>