<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (1) TMI 95 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150699</link>
    <description>Round timber logs and sized timber were treated as distinct commercial commodities, because processing logs into sized timber created a market product with a different commercial identity. Where the purchaser had undertaken to resell the timber bought under declaration, converting it before sale breached that undertaking. The sale of the converted product therefore attracted the proviso to section 5(2)(A)(a)(ii) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:58:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (1) TMI 95 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150699</link>
      <description>Round timber logs and sized timber were treated as distinct commercial commodities, because processing logs into sized timber created a market product with a different commercial identity. Where the purchaser had undertaken to resell the timber bought under declaration, converting it before sale breached that undertaking. The sale of the converted product therefore attracted the proviso to section 5(2)(A)(a)(ii) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>