<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (2) TMI 110 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150659</link>
    <description>Section 14(7) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act was construed to exclude time only from the date of assessment until the date the assessment is set aside by the appellate or revisional authority. The provision was held not to extend to the date on which the setting-aside order is served or communicated, because the statute does not use service-based language. The court contrasted this wording with other provisions in the Act that expressly make service the starting point for limitation, and treated the text of section 14(7) as clear and not capable of enlargement. The limitation objection therefore failed, and the Tribunal&#039;s view was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:36:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (2) TMI 110 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150659</link>
      <description>Section 14(7) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act was construed to exclude time only from the date of assessment until the date the assessment is set aside by the appellate or revisional authority. The provision was held not to extend to the date on which the setting-aside order is served or communicated, because the statute does not use service-based language. The court contrasted this wording with other provisions in the Act that expressly make service the starting point for limitation, and treated the text of section 14(7) as clear and not capable of enlargement. The limitation objection therefore failed, and the Tribunal&#039;s view was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>