<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (4) TMI 108 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150657</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and directed a fresh assessment, emphasizing the importance of providing the assessee with a reasonable opportunity to present evidence and clarify entries in anamath records. The Court criticized the Tribunal for not adequately considering the nexus between the assessee and the transactions, stressing the assessing authority&#039;s right to use such records for a best judgment assessment. Additionally, the Court supported the reinstatement of the appeal, highlighting the need for a fair chance for the assessee to argue his case on merits rather than dismissing it solely on procedural grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:24:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (4) TMI 108 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150657</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and directed a fresh assessment, emphasizing the importance of providing the assessee with a reasonable opportunity to present evidence and clarify entries in anamath records. The Court criticized the Tribunal for not adequately considering the nexus between the assessee and the transactions, stressing the assessing authority&#039;s right to use such records for a best judgment assessment. Additionally, the Court supported the reinstatement of the appeal, highlighting the need for a fair chance for the assessee to argue his case on merits rather than dismissing it solely on procedural grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>