<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (8) TMI 145 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150646</link>
    <description>Under section 9 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, an appeal is valid only when filed with satisfactory proof of payment of the admitted tax, and that deposit requirement is a condition precedent rather than a separate obligation. Section 5 of the Limitation Act applies to appeals under the Act, so the same sufficient cause that supports condonation of delay in filing the appeal also governs delay in depositing the admitted tax. The earlier view that such delay could not be condoned was no longer good law in light of binding Supreme Court authority. The delay in deposit was therefore treated as automatically condoned once the delay in filing the appeal was condoned, in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:15:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (8) TMI 145 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150646</link>
      <description>Under section 9 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, an appeal is valid only when filed with satisfactory proof of payment of the admitted tax, and that deposit requirement is a condition precedent rather than a separate obligation. Section 5 of the Limitation Act applies to appeals under the Act, so the same sufficient cause that supports condonation of delay in filing the appeal also governs delay in depositing the admitted tax. The earlier view that such delay could not be condoned was no longer good law in light of binding Supreme Court authority. The delay in deposit was therefore treated as automatically condoned once the delay in filing the appeal was condoned, in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>