<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (7) TMI 100 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150645</link>
    <description>Sales by a statutory Port Trust of unclaimed and unserviceable goods, made under statutory powers for recovery of dues, were not business transactions liable to sales tax because they were not commercial or incidental to trading activity. The enlarged definition of business did not alter the requirement that the seller must be carrying on business in the relevant sense, so the Port Trust was not a dealer on that basis. The deeming provision for Government departments or local authorities also did not apply, because a statutory disposal in performance of public duties is not business and cannot attract dealer status merely by fiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:11:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (7) TMI 100 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150645</link>
      <description>Sales by a statutory Port Trust of unclaimed and unserviceable goods, made under statutory powers for recovery of dues, were not business transactions liable to sales tax because they were not commercial or incidental to trading activity. The enlarged definition of business did not alter the requirement that the seller must be carrying on business in the relevant sense, so the Port Trust was not a dealer on that basis. The deeming provision for Government departments or local authorities also did not apply, because a statutory disposal in performance of public duties is not business and cannot attract dealer status merely by fiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>