<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (7) TMI 98 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150631</link>
    <description>Goods moving from Madras to Calcutta were treated as inter-State sales because the surrounding documents, including invoices, correspondence, bills of lading and C forms, showed that the movement was referable to prior contracts with out-of-State buyers. The revenue&#039;s theory of an initial local sale followed by onward sale was not supported by the materials, and the local dealer&#039;s role was equally consistent with agency. On that evidence, the movement of goods was an incident of the contract of sale, so assessment under the Madras General Sales Tax Act could not stand; the State could, however, proceed under the Central sales tax regime.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:51:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (7) TMI 98 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150631</link>
      <description>Goods moving from Madras to Calcutta were treated as inter-State sales because the surrounding documents, including invoices, correspondence, bills of lading and C forms, showed that the movement was referable to prior contracts with out-of-State buyers. The revenue&#039;s theory of an initial local sale followed by onward sale was not supported by the materials, and the local dealer&#039;s role was equally consistent with agency. On that evidence, the movement of goods was an incident of the contract of sale, so assessment under the Madras General Sales Tax Act could not stand; the State could, however, proceed under the Central sales tax regime.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>