<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (1) TMI 91 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150610</link>
    <description>A radiologist charging a consolidated fee for X-ray examination and technical advice was treated as providing a professional service, not effecting a taxable sale of goods. The decisive test was the true character of the transaction: where the primary object is work and labour, an incidental transfer or use of materials does not become a sale unless a distinct and severable contract of sale exists. The X-ray plate was merely incidental to the service, and its passing did not convert the arrangement into a commercial sale. On that basis, the radiologist was not a dealer under the Orissa Sales Tax Act and the service turnover was not subject to sales tax as a sale of goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:05:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (1) TMI 91 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150610</link>
      <description>A radiologist charging a consolidated fee for X-ray examination and technical advice was treated as providing a professional service, not effecting a taxable sale of goods. The decisive test was the true character of the transaction: where the primary object is work and labour, an incidental transfer or use of materials does not become a sale unless a distinct and severable contract of sale exists. The X-ray plate was merely incidental to the service, and its passing did not convert the arrangement into a commercial sale. On that basis, the radiologist was not a dealer under the Orissa Sales Tax Act and the service turnover was not subject to sales tax as a sale of goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>