<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (11) TMI 65 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150569</link>
    <description>De-oiled rice bran was held to fall within the expression &quot;cattle fodder&quot; in the sales tax exemption notification because it was used as cattle feed and there was no effective denial of that use. The Court treated &quot;fodder&quot; as food supplied to cattle and found no material distinction between cattle fodder and cattle feed for the purpose of the notification. It was therefore covered by the exemption and not liable to sales tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 16:49:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (11) TMI 65 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150569</link>
      <description>De-oiled rice bran was held to fall within the expression &quot;cattle fodder&quot; in the sales tax exemption notification because it was used as cattle feed and there was no effective denial of that use. The Court treated &quot;fodder&quot; as food supplied to cattle and found no material distinction between cattle fodder and cattle feed for the purpose of the notification. It was therefore covered by the exemption and not liable to sales tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>