<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (7) TMI 86 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150567</link>
    <description>A contract for producing and supplying advertisement films was treated as a works or service contract rather than a sale of goods liable to sales tax. The arrangement required the producer to make the films to the advertiser&#039;s script and directions, with final approval and any reshooting at the producer&#039;s cost. Under the Copyright Act, a cinematograph film includes its sound track, and where it is made for valuable consideration at the instance of a person, that person is the first owner of the copyright absent a contrary agreement. On these facts, the advertiser owned the exploitable rights in the finished films, and the sale tax assessment failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 16:41:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (7) TMI 86 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150567</link>
      <description>A contract for producing and supplying advertisement films was treated as a works or service contract rather than a sale of goods liable to sales tax. The arrangement required the producer to make the films to the advertiser&#039;s script and directions, with final approval and any reshooting at the producer&#039;s cost. Under the Copyright Act, a cinematograph film includes its sound track, and where it is made for valuable consideration at the instance of a person, that person is the first owner of the copyright absent a contrary agreement. On these facts, the advertiser owned the exploitable rights in the finished films, and the sale tax assessment failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>