<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (7) TMI 100 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150536</link>
    <description>Where no return is filed under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, best judgment assessment falls under the non-filing provision, while escaped turnover may still be assessed under the escaped-assessment provision because the two operate in different fields. The limitation for escaped-assessment proceedings is six years, not four years, and that period governs the associated penalty proceedings as well. The penalty power is ancillary to the escaped-assessment process, so it cannot be exercised later on an open-ended basis. The amended penalty provision applicable when the proceedings were initiated governed the matter, and the penalty challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 13:05:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (7) TMI 100 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150536</link>
      <description>Where no return is filed under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, best judgment assessment falls under the non-filing provision, while escaped turnover may still be assessed under the escaped-assessment provision because the two operate in different fields. The limitation for escaped-assessment proceedings is six years, not four years, and that period governs the associated penalty proceedings as well. The penalty power is ancillary to the escaped-assessment process, so it cannot be exercised later on an open-ended basis. The amended penalty provision applicable when the proceedings were initiated governed the matter, and the penalty challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>