<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (11) TMI 87 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150512</link>
    <description>In hire-purchase sales, the assessable sale price must be fixed as on the date ownership actually passes, not merely by reference to the contractual period, and depreciation must be determined on relevant materials and a reasonable basis after giving the assessee an opportunity to produce evidence; the valuation was therefore unsustainable and had to be redone. The constitutional challenge to surcharge under the Kerala Surcharge on Taxes Act, 1957 was rejected because it was already covered by an earlier HC decision upholding the levy; that challenge failed. The assessment was set aside to the extent indicated and a fresh assessment was directed in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 17:58:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (11) TMI 87 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150512</link>
      <description>In hire-purchase sales, the assessable sale price must be fixed as on the date ownership actually passes, not merely by reference to the contractual period, and depreciation must be determined on relevant materials and a reasonable basis after giving the assessee an opportunity to produce evidence; the valuation was therefore unsustainable and had to be redone. The constitutional challenge to surcharge under the Kerala Surcharge on Taxes Act, 1957 was rejected because it was already covered by an earlier HC decision upholding the levy; that challenge failed. The assessment was set aside to the extent indicated and a fresh assessment was directed in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>