<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (7) TMI 99 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150511</link>
    <description>Cotton ropes made of twisted strands were held not to fall within the expression &quot;braided cords&quot; in the tax notification, because &quot;braided&quot; requires weaving, plaiting or interlacing. The reduced rate of tax was therefore unavailable. The Court also held that a Board of Revenue clarification issued to other dealers was not a statutory notification or order under section 17 of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959, and could not bind taxing authorities. A departmental view cannot override the statute, and there can be no estoppel against a statutory charging and exemption scheme; the assessment was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 17:55:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (7) TMI 99 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150511</link>
      <description>Cotton ropes made of twisted strands were held not to fall within the expression &quot;braided cords&quot; in the tax notification, because &quot;braided&quot; requires weaving, plaiting or interlacing. The reduced rate of tax was therefore unavailable. The Court also held that a Board of Revenue clarification issued to other dealers was not a statutory notification or order under section 17 of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959, and could not bind taxing authorities. A departmental view cannot override the statute, and there can be no estoppel against a statutory charging and exemption scheme; the assessment was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>