<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (4) TMI 90 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150508</link>
    <description>Endorsement of railway receipts during transit was treated as a sale in the course of inter-State trade because the transfer of documents of title occurred while movement of the goods from one State to another was still continuing. The State from which that movement commenced had the statutory nexus to assess and collect the turnover under the Central Sales Tax scheme, so Orissa was the proper assessing State. Liability of a commission agent depended on the real terms of the commission arrangement and whether he had authority to sell in his own name and pass valid title; on the existing record, that issue required further factual inquiry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 17:28:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (4) TMI 90 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150508</link>
      <description>Endorsement of railway receipts during transit was treated as a sale in the course of inter-State trade because the transfer of documents of title occurred while movement of the goods from one State to another was still continuing. The State from which that movement commenced had the statutory nexus to assess and collect the turnover under the Central Sales Tax scheme, so Orissa was the proper assessing State. Liability of a commission agent depended on the real terms of the commission arrangement and whether he had authority to sell in his own name and pass valid title; on the existing record, that issue required further factual inquiry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>