<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (10) TMI 125 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150505</link>
    <description>Misuse of a dealer&#039;s registration certificate could not be inferred merely because sales were made to a purchaser whose registration had been cancelled or because account books were not produced for verification. Those facts might affect entitlement to deduction or justify best judgment assessment, but they did not by themselves establish misuse within the power to cancel registration for sufficient cause. The High Court therefore held that cancellation of the assessee&#039;s registration certificate on the alleged ground of misuse was without jurisdiction and could not stand. The cancellation order was quashed, with costs awarded against the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 17:10:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (10) TMI 125 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150505</link>
      <description>Misuse of a dealer&#039;s registration certificate could not be inferred merely because sales were made to a purchaser whose registration had been cancelled or because account books were not produced for verification. Those facts might affect entitlement to deduction or justify best judgment assessment, but they did not by themselves establish misuse within the power to cancel registration for sufficient cause. The High Court therefore held that cancellation of the assessee&#039;s registration certificate on the alleged ground of misuse was without jurisdiction and could not stand. The cancellation order was quashed, with costs awarded against the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>