<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (3) TMI 80 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150488</link>
    <description>A validating tax amendment is effective where the Legislature has competence, cures the defect identified by the court, and clearly authorises retrospective levy or reassessment. The Andhra Pradesh amendment concerning watery coconuts was held not to require Presidential reservation under Article 200 because it did not negate judicial decisions but removed the defect in the charging scheme. Sections 6, 7 and 8 were treated as retrospectively operating by necessary implication and as validating earlier assessments. The assessing authority was therefore empowered to revise the assessment notwithstanding the earlier High Court order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:06:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (3) TMI 80 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150488</link>
      <description>A validating tax amendment is effective where the Legislature has competence, cures the defect identified by the court, and clearly authorises retrospective levy or reassessment. The Andhra Pradesh amendment concerning watery coconuts was held not to require Presidential reservation under Article 200 because it did not negate judicial decisions but removed the defect in the charging scheme. Sections 6, 7 and 8 were treated as retrospectively operating by necessary implication and as validating earlier assessments. The assessing authority was therefore empowered to revise the assessment notwithstanding the earlier High Court order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>