<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (9) TMI 129 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150465</link>
    <description>A hire-purchase arrangement is not a sale until the option to purchase is exercised, so a deeming provision treating such transactions as sales could not validly enlarge the State&#039;s taxing power under the sales entry. The Court also held that goods purchased on declaration for resale were not diverted to a different purpose merely because they were later used in genuine hire-purchase transactions leading to eventual resale. On that basis, additions made to taxable turnover under the deeming provision and the proviso dealing with use for a purpose other than resale were struck down, and the assessee&#039;s challenge succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 11:54:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (9) TMI 129 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150465</link>
      <description>A hire-purchase arrangement is not a sale until the option to purchase is exercised, so a deeming provision treating such transactions as sales could not validly enlarge the State&#039;s taxing power under the sales entry. The Court also held that goods purchased on declaration for resale were not diverted to a different purpose merely because they were later used in genuine hire-purchase transactions leading to eventual resale. On that basis, additions made to taxable turnover under the deeming provision and the proviso dealing with use for a purpose other than resale were struck down, and the assessee&#039;s challenge succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>