<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (10) TMI 118 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150464</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 11-A of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act could be founded on information showing that purchasing dealers were not genuine dealers, including facts that later came to light, so the challenge based on absence of fresh material failed. However, the reassessment was invalid because the Assessing Authority relied on an internal departmental communication without proving publication of cancellation of registration certificates in the official Gazette and refused to summon records or witnesses, thereby denying a fair opportunity to rebut the allegation. The reassessment order was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh decision in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 11:49:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (10) TMI 118 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150464</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 11-A of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act could be founded on information showing that purchasing dealers were not genuine dealers, including facts that later came to light, so the challenge based on absence of fresh material failed. However, the reassessment was invalid because the Assessing Authority relied on an internal departmental communication without proving publication of cancellation of registration certificates in the official Gazette and refused to summon records or witnesses, thereby denying a fair opportunity to rebut the allegation. The reassessment order was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh decision in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>