<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (11) TMI 83 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150460</link>
    <description>A prosecution for non-payment of tax assessed under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 could not be sustained under section 29(1)(d) of the Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1957, because that provision applies only to tax assessed under the State Act and unpaid within the time allowed. Section 9(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act authorises State authorities to assess and recover central sales tax as if it were State tax, but it does not itself create a penal mechanism for default. As section 10 of the Central Sales Tax Act does not include such default among punishable offences, the prosecution had no legal foundation and the acquittals were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 11:20:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (11) TMI 83 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150460</link>
      <description>A prosecution for non-payment of tax assessed under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 could not be sustained under section 29(1)(d) of the Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1957, because that provision applies only to tax assessed under the State Act and unpaid within the time allowed. Section 9(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act authorises State authorities to assess and recover central sales tax as if it were State tax, but it does not itself create a penal mechanism for default. As section 10 of the Central Sales Tax Act does not include such default among punishable offences, the prosecution had no legal foundation and the acquittals were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>