<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (5) TMI 53 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150453</link>
    <description>Quarterly returns filed in the prescribed form, even with nil figures and explanatory notes, are treated as returns in law and may support assessment proceedings under section 11(2) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948. Where such returns are treated as filed returns, the notice mechanism for non-filing under section 11(5) and its time limit do not apply, so a limitation objection based on that provision fails. The text also states that assessment remains valid where the Assessing Authority otherwise has jurisdiction, and the absence of a formal transfer order does not void the proceedings if the defect is only irregular and the dealer has acquiesced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 10:39:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (5) TMI 53 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150453</link>
      <description>Quarterly returns filed in the prescribed form, even with nil figures and explanatory notes, are treated as returns in law and may support assessment proceedings under section 11(2) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948. Where such returns are treated as filed returns, the notice mechanism for non-filing under section 11(5) and its time limit do not apply, so a limitation objection based on that provision fails. The text also states that assessment remains valid where the Assessing Authority otherwise has jurisdiction, and the absence of a formal transfer order does not void the proceedings if the defect is only irregular and the dealer has acquiesced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>