<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (12) TMI 105 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150446</link>
    <description>State sales tax on declared goods is valid if the statutory scheme, read as a whole, makes a single taxable stage ascertainable and prevents multiple taxation of the same goods. The M.P. General Sales Tax Act, as amended, was construed with section 6 and the Second Schedule to show that tax on oil-seeds arose when a registered dealer sold to a consumer or an unregistered dealer, with later sales excluded. The absence of an express statement of the levy stage did not invalidate the tax, because the Act itself disclosed a single point of taxation. The levy was therefore held consistent with section 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act and article 286(3) of the Constitution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 10:01:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (12) TMI 105 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150446</link>
      <description>State sales tax on declared goods is valid if the statutory scheme, read as a whole, makes a single taxable stage ascertainable and prevents multiple taxation of the same goods. The M.P. General Sales Tax Act, as amended, was construed with section 6 and the Second Schedule to show that tax on oil-seeds arose when a registered dealer sold to a consumer or an unregistered dealer, with later sales excluded. The absence of an express statement of the levy stage did not invalidate the tax, because the Act itself disclosed a single point of taxation. The levy was therefore held consistent with section 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act and article 286(3) of the Constitution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>