<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (10) TMI 109 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150434</link>
    <description>A mere sale of the entire cloth stock, even with transfer of tenancy rights in the shop premises, does not by itself amount to transfer or succession of the business under section 17 of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948. Liability arises only where the ownership of the business as a going concern is entirely transferred and the transferee carries it on. In the absence of evidence of transfer of goodwill, furniture, account books, liabilities, employees, or other incidents of a running business, the transaction is not a business transfer. The sales tax authorities&#039; contrary view was therefore erroneous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 17:33:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (10) TMI 109 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150434</link>
      <description>A mere sale of the entire cloth stock, even with transfer of tenancy rights in the shop premises, does not by itself amount to transfer or succession of the business under section 17 of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948. Liability arises only where the ownership of the business as a going concern is entirely transferred and the transferee carries it on. In the absence of evidence of transfer of goodwill, furniture, account books, liabilities, employees, or other incidents of a running business, the transaction is not a business transfer. The sales tax authorities&#039; contrary view was therefore erroneous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>