<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (8) TMI 119 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150431</link>
    <description>Ambiguous sales tax entries may be interpreted with the aid of later legislative amendment and contemporaneous administrative understanding. On that approach, bodies built on chassis supplied by customers were not covered by item 3 of Schedule I to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 before the 1965 amendment, because the later insertion of bodies built on chassis belonging to others indicated that the earlier wording did not clearly include them. The interpretive history showed that the amendment was intended to bring such bodies within the entry, so the disputed turnover could not be taxed under the pre-amendment provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 17:29:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (8) TMI 119 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150431</link>
      <description>Ambiguous sales tax entries may be interpreted with the aid of later legislative amendment and contemporaneous administrative understanding. On that approach, bodies built on chassis supplied by customers were not covered by item 3 of Schedule I to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 before the 1965 amendment, because the later insertion of bodies built on chassis belonging to others indicated that the earlier wording did not clearly include them. The interpretive history showed that the amendment was intended to bring such bodies within the entry, so the disputed turnover could not be taxed under the pre-amendment provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>