<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (6) TMI 55 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150415</link>
    <description>A return filed under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act was treated as setting in motion an integrated process of levy, assessment and collection, so the tax proceeding was pending on the appointed date for section 4(d) of the Oriental Gas Company Act, 1960. Recovery under the Public Demands Recovery Act was held to be a continuation of the same tax process, with the pending liability transferable to the State of West Bengal rather than enforceable against the petitioner. Prior participation in the assessment did not bar reliance on section 4(d), because there is no estoppel against a statute and statutory protection cannot be defeated by conduct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 14:59:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (6) TMI 55 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150415</link>
      <description>A return filed under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act was treated as setting in motion an integrated process of levy, assessment and collection, so the tax proceeding was pending on the appointed date for section 4(d) of the Oriental Gas Company Act, 1960. Recovery under the Public Demands Recovery Act was held to be a continuation of the same tax process, with the pending liability transferable to the State of West Bengal rather than enforceable against the petitioner. Prior participation in the assessment did not bar reliance on section 4(d), because there is no estoppel against a statute and statutory protection cannot be defeated by conduct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>