<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 701 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150391</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether the limitation period applicable to a claim for the principal amount also governs a claim for interest arising from that principal claim. The SC held, as a matter of reasonableness and legal symmetry, that the same limitation period must apply to the interest claim because interest is ancillary to, and dependent upon, the principal liability. Consequently, the SC found no merit in the appeals and dismissed them with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 17:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 701 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150391</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether the limitation period applicable to a claim for the principal amount also governs a claim for interest arising from that principal claim. The SC held, as a matter of reasonableness and legal symmetry, that the same limitation period must apply to the interest claim because interest is ancillary to, and dependent upon, the principal liability. Consequently, the SC found no merit in the appeals and dismissed them with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>