<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (12) TMI 68 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150382</link>
    <description>Fiscal exemptions are construed in their common and commercial sense, not by botanical or technical meaning, so ripened coconut was held not to fall within &quot;fresh fruits&quot; or &quot;vegetables&quot; under the exemption notification. The analysis treated the notification as aimed at a narrower class of perishable items and noted that coconut had been specifically excluded under earlier exemptions. Because coconut is not ordinarily understood in common parlance as a fresh fruit or a vegetable, and its culinary use did not change that character, the exemption did not apply and the revenue&#039;s challenge succeeded in the connected tax matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 11:03:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (12) TMI 68 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150382</link>
      <description>Fiscal exemptions are construed in their common and commercial sense, not by botanical or technical meaning, so ripened coconut was held not to fall within &quot;fresh fruits&quot; or &quot;vegetables&quot; under the exemption notification. The analysis treated the notification as aimed at a narrower class of perishable items and noted that coconut had been specifically excluded under earlier exemptions. Because coconut is not ordinarily understood in common parlance as a fresh fruit or a vegetable, and its culinary use did not change that character, the exemption did not apply and the revenue&#039;s challenge succeeded in the connected tax matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>